XHawk AI Platform Review: A Promising “Shared Brain” for Human–Agent Teams, but Still Early in Its Journey

AI coding tools have become remarkably capable. They can write functions, explain unfamiliar code, generate tests, review pull requests, and sometimes build an entire working application from a short prompt. Yet anyone who has used tools such as Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, or other coding agents for more than a few weeks has probably encountered the same frustrating problem:

The AI may be intelligent, but it often has a poor memory of the project.

A new session begins, and the agent has to rediscover the architecture. It searches through files that were already explained in a previous conversation. It may understand what a recent commit changed but not why the team made that decision. Important constraints disappear into old chat histories, scattered pull-request comments, forgotten documentation, or the minds of developers who happen to remember the project’s history.

This is the problem XHawk is trying to solve.

I have been a comparitively new user of this platform but it has impressed me quickly. Initially it may look similar to Gemini Notebook(previously called NotebookLM). But they differ:

Feature	XHawk	Google NotebookLM (Gemini)
Primary purpose	AI workspace for software engineering and enterprise workflows	AI research and knowledge synthesis
Core concept	Persistent organizational context + autonomous agents	Grounded AI over uploaded sources
Best for	Developers, engineering teams, DevOps, enterprise AI	Researchers, students, writers, analysts
Knowledge source	Code repositories, Git history, PRs, docs, issues, AI sessions	PDFs, Docs, Slides, websites, YouTube, notes
Can modify code?	Yes	No
Autonomous agents	Yes	No
Repository awareness	Deep	None
Workflow automation	Yes	Minimal
Enterprise orchestration	Yes	No

XHawk positions itself as a multiplayer AI workspace and a persistent organizational context layer where humans and AI agents can work from a shared knowledge base. Its broader vision goes beyond being another AI coding assistant. The platform wants to become an operational environment where specialized agents plan, build, test, review, document, analyze, and hand off work while preserving the reasoning and history behind those actions.

The interface shown in the supplied screenshot reflects that ambition. Instead of opening directly into a traditional code editor, XHawk presents a clean assistant workspace with options such as Brainstorm, Build, Review, and Data Analysis. The prompt field also suggests attaching files, raising issues, reviewing pull requests, and assigning agents. The design communicates that XHawk is intended to be a broader AI work environment rather than merely an autocomplete tool.

However, there is an important qualification: XHawk is still a relatively new product. Its public launch as XHawk 0.99 appeared on Product Hunt in March 2026, where it ranked fourth for the day and attracted substantial launch interest. At the time of research, however, the Product Hunt page still showed no formal user reviews.

That makes XHawk interesting but difficult to judge with the same confidence as mature platforms that have hundreds or thousands of independently verified reviews. The public discussion is currently dominated by launch feedback, early adopters, product announcements, and the company’s own explanations. Searches across major review and developer communities also reveal a surprisingly small independent evidence base. There appears to be no meaningful body of XHawk-specific discussions on Stack Overflow, and mainstream review platforms do not yet provide a substantial verified rating history.

That absence is not automatically a negative. It is partly the result of the platform’s newness. But it does mean that the strongest claims about productivity, reliability, and business impact should still be treated as promising hypotheses rather than established industry facts.

What XHawk Is Actually Trying to Build

The easiest way to understand XHawk is to separate its vision into three connected layers.

The first is the AI assistant layer. This is the visible part represented in the screenshot: users can ask questions, brainstorm ideas, build software, review pull requests, and analyze data through a conversational interface.

The second is the agent orchestration layer. XHawk says that specialized agents can work across planning, implementation, code review, testing, security, documentation, and other workflows. These agents can be triggered through schedules, GitHub events, CI failures, Slack, webhooks, Kanban work items, and other automation mechanisms.

The third—and arguably most distinctive—layer is the System of Context. XHawk aims to ingest code, documentation, architecture decisions, pull requests, coding sessions, repository changes, and conversations. It then connects those materials into a queryable knowledge graph or context index that can be accessed through interfaces such as MCP, CLI, SDKs, and dashboards.

The underlying idea is compelling: every coding session should leave behind more than code. It should preserve the intent, decisions, constraints, and lessons that led to the code.

That could change how teams use AI. Instead of repeatedly explaining the project to each new agent, the organization gradually develops a shared memory that both humans and AI systems can consult.

The Major Advantages of XHawk

1. It tackles one of the biggest weaknesses in AI-assisted development: context loss

Most AI coding tools are excellent at working within the context they currently possess. Their weakness is that the context is often temporary, incomplete, or expensive to reconstruct.

XHawk’s System of Context attempts to turn previous AI sessions, commits, code changes, and organizational knowledge into a persistent asset. The company describes this as a living knowledge layer that grows as people and agents continue working.

This could be particularly useful in large or long-lived projects.

Imagine a developer joining a two-year-old application. The source code may reveal how authentication works, but it might not explain why the team rejected a particular identity provider, why an unusual validation rule exists, or why a service was intentionally designed in a less obvious way.

Traditional documentation often becomes outdated because it depends on people remembering to update it. XHawk’s approach is different: it attempts to generate knowledge from the work itself.

That is potentially one of its strongest advantages.

2. It preserves the reasoning behind code, not merely the final result

Git already records changes. Pull requests preserve some discussion. Issue trackers capture requirements. Documentation describes intended behavior.

But these sources are fragmented.

The most valuable knowledge is sometimes hidden in an AI conversation:

“We tried approach A, but it caused a race condition.”

“Do not use this internal API because it will be removed next quarter.”

“This apparently redundant check is required because of a legacy customer workflow.”

Those details may never reach the commit message.

XHawk’s Product Hunt launch describes capturing AI coding sessions and linking agent reasoning to commits. The platform also emphasizes “negative knowledge”—information about what should not be done and why.

That concept deserves attention. AI systems frequently fail not because they lack general knowledge, but because they do not know the project-specific exceptions.

A coding agent might know the best practice for designing a database layer. It does not automatically know that a particular project deliberately avoids that pattern because of historical performance problems. Persistent negative knowledge could reduce repeated mistakes.

3. The multi-model strategy may reduce vendor lock-in

Many AI development platforms are closely associated with one model provider. That can be convenient, but it also creates dependency.

XHawk describes itself as multi-model by design, with the ability to route work across frontier, open-source, and private models.

In theory, this allows teams to choose different models for different tasks.

A powerful reasoning model might be used for architecture planning. A lower-cost model could handle routine documentation. A private model might be required for sensitive workloads. Another model might be preferred for code review or data analysis.

The advantage is not simply choice. It is flexibility.

AI models evolve rapidly. A platform built around one provider may force customers to wait for that provider’s improvements. A multi-model orchestration layer could allow organizations to change models without rebuilding their entire workflow.

The challenge, however, is whether XHawk’s routing actually produces better results in practice. The concept is strong, but independent benchmarking is still limited.

4. It moves beyond the “developer and chatbot” model

The screenshot’s categories—Brainstorm, Build, Review, and Data Analysis—suggest that XHawk is designed around different kinds of work rather than one generic chat box.

That is useful because software development is not one activity.

A product manager may want to explore feature ideas. An engineer may need implementation help. A reviewer may want a pull-request analysis. A business user may want to ask questions about a CSV file. A technical lead may need to assign several tasks to different agents.

XHawk attempts to place these activities in one environment.

The company also describes integrations across Slack, Kanban boards, MCP servers, APIs, GitHub events, CI failures, and webhooks.

If these integrations work smoothly, the platform could reduce the constant switching between chat tools, coding environments, issue trackers, documentation systems, and automation platforms.

5. Background agents could create genuine operational leverage

One of XHawk’s more ambitious ideas is the use of background agents that work continuously rather than only when a developer is actively typing.

According to the platform, agents can be triggered by events, schedules, or fleets and can operate in cloud sandboxes or isolated development environments.

This opens interesting possibilities:

• An agent monitors failed CI builds and investigates recurring failures.
• A documentation agent updates technical explanations after merged pull requests.
• A review agent checks every new change for security or architectural issues.
• A testing agent generates additional edge-case tests overnight.
• A maintenance agent identifies outdated dependencies.
• A planning agent breaks a large feature into smaller tasks.

The value here is continuity. A human team stops working at the end of the day. An automated agent system can continue performing defined tasks.

Still, autonomous work is only useful when the results are observable and reviewable. XHawk’s emphasis on tracing and auditing agent actions is therefore important.

6. The interface appears approachable

The supplied screenshot shows a relatively uncluttered design.

The central question—“What would you like to accomplish?”—is simple and inviting. The suggested actions provide guidance without overwhelming the user. The sidebar contains chat history and navigation, while the main workspace remains focused.

This may seem like a minor detail, but AI platforms often become difficult to use because they expose too much complexity too early. Users may have to understand agents, models, context windows, tokens, tools, workflows, and integrations before completing a basic task.

XHawk’s interface appears to hide much of that complexity behind familiar actions.

The challenge will be maintaining this simplicity as advanced features are added. Agent orchestration is inherently complex. A platform can either hide too much and become mysterious or expose too much and become intimidating.

XHawk will need to balance both.

7. Flexible deployment could appeal to enterprises

XHawk advertises cloud, hybrid, and private deployment options, including deployments in customer-controlled AWS, Google Cloud, or Azure environments.

This is potentially important for organizations with strict security, compliance, or data residency requirements.

A company may want the convenience of a managed AI control plane while keeping code and sensitive information inside its own infrastructure. The hybrid approach is intended to address that need.

The company’s terms also state that it does not sell, license, or share customer data with third parties and that data is used to provide services such as code analysis, learning paths, and AI-assisted features.

These commitments are positive, although enterprise buyers should still conduct their own security and legal reviews. Public policy statements are not substitutes for technical validation, contractual guarantees, penetration testing, access-control reviews, or compliance evidence.

The Disadvantages and Risks

1. XHawk is still too new to have a mature independent review ecosystem

This is the biggest limitation in evaluating the platform.

XHawk’s Product Hunt launch received strong attention and ranked fourth for the day, but the page currently contains launch comments rather than a large body of verified long-term reviews. It also showed no formal reviews at the time of research.

The public Reddit discussion is similarly limited. One early discussion describes the concept positively but also acknowledges that the platform is new and not yet battle-tested at large scale.

There is little evidence of widespread independent usage reports on Stack Overflow, G2, Capterra, or major developer communities.

That creates a credibility gap.

The platform may be excellent. But there is not yet enough external evidence to confidently answer questions such as:

• How reliable is XHawk on very large repositories?
• How accurate is its context retrieval?
• How often does it surface irrelevant information?
• How well does it handle monorepos?
• Does it remain responsive when many agents work simultaneously?
• How much engineering time does it actually save?
• How frequently do teams need to correct agent-generated work?

These are questions that require months of independent usage.

2. The platform’s vision may be broader than many teams currently need

XHawk is not simply offering AI chat. It combines context management, agent orchestration, knowledge graphs, automation, project planning, model routing, background workers, data analysis, and deployment infrastructure.

That breadth is exciting, but it may also create complexity.

A small development team might only want a reliable coding assistant. It may not need an agent factory, company-wide knowledge graph, asynchronous work queues, or multiple background workers.

In such cases, XHawk could feel like an entire operating system when the team only needs a good text editor and an AI assistant.

The platform will need to demonstrate that its additional layers create measurable value rather than administrative overhead.

3. Capturing AI reasoning introduces privacy and governance questions

Persistent context is powerful because it remembers.

But memory also creates responsibility.

If XHawk captures AI sessions, prompts, reasoning, code changes, and organizational decisions, companies must consider what information enters the knowledge layer.

Developers sometimes include sensitive information in prompts:

• Internal architecture details
• Security findings
• Customer information
• Credentials accidentally pasted into a terminal
• Proprietary business plans
• Unreleased product information

Even if the platform has strong security policies, organizations need clear controls over retention, deletion, permissions, and access.

Who can view an old AI session?

Can sensitive conversations be excluded?

How long are records retained?

Can an employee remove information that should not have been captured?

How is access controlled across teams?

These are not reasons to reject XHawk. They are governance questions that become more important as the platform’s memory grows.

4. Automatically captured context may become noisy

More context is not always better context.

A project can generate thousands of commits, conversations, pull-request comments, failed experiments, temporary branches, and AI interactions. If everything is stored without strong filtering, the knowledge system may accumulate noise.

The result could be a new version of an old problem: instead of searching through source code, developers search through an enormous AI-generated archive.

XHawk’s context-index approach is intended to summarize and structure information rather than simply dump raw histories. Product Hunt discussions specifically raised questions about summary generation and relevance tracking.

But the long-term quality of those summaries will be crucial.

An inaccurate summary can be more dangerous than missing documentation because users may trust it.

5. The platform’s productivity claims are not yet independently validated

XHawk’s public materials mention outcomes such as faster planning, more features shipped, less meeting time, and fewer production bugs.

These numbers are attractive, but they should be interpreted carefully because they are vendor-published claims rather than independently audited industry benchmarks.

Productivity is difficult to measure.

If a team ships more features, are those features better?

If planning becomes faster, are important design discussions being skipped?

If agents reduce meetings, do people lose valuable communication?

If code is generated more quickly, does review work increase later?

Research into AI-assisted code review suggests that adoption does not automatically translate into useful outcomes. Effectiveness can vary significantly depending on tool design, configuration, review context, and how the AI output is presented.

XHawk should therefore be evaluated through controlled trials rather than marketing metrics alone.

6. Credit-based pricing may be simpler than token pricing—but still requires monitoring

XHawk says it aggregates model costs, tokens, and sandbox usage into credits. The public pricing page lists a free plan with 500 credits during the first month and a Pro plan at $20 per month with 1,000 credits, plus pay-as-you-go usage.

The advantage is simplicity. Most users do not want to calculate token costs.

However, credits can become opaque if customers do not understand how much work a credit represents.

For example:

• How many code reviews consume 100 credits?
• How expensive is a long-running agent?
• Do different models consume credits at different rates?
• Does a failed agent run consume credits?
• How much does a large repository analysis cost?

The company says there are no hidden multipliers, which is encouraging. Still, customers should monitor actual usage during a pilot before assuming that the monthly allowance will cover their workload.

7. Autonomous agents can create new forms of operational risk

An AI assistant that suggests code is relatively easy to supervise.

An agent that automatically changes code, opens pull requests, triggers workflows, accesses repositories, and works continuously has much more power.

That can be useful—but mistakes can also scale faster.

A poorly configured agent may:

• Generate repetitive pull requests
• Misinterpret an issue
• Modify the wrong service
• Introduce inconsistent patterns
• Consume excessive compute resources
• Create large volumes of low-value work

XHawk’s audit and observability features are designed to reduce these risks.

Nevertheless, organizations should begin with limited permissions and human approval gates. Autonomous execution should be earned through demonstrated reliability, not enabled everywhere on day one.

What the Public Discussion Really Tells Us

The current public reaction to XHawk is best described as curious optimism rather than proven consensus.

The Product Hunt community responded positively to the idea of persistent engineering context. Comments recognized the usefulness of capturing knowledge from complex projects and raised thoughtful questions about summaries, checkpoints, branches, and relevance.

The limited Reddit discussion also reflects enthusiasm for the persistent-memory concept while acknowledging that the product is still early and lacks large-scale validation.

What is missing is equally important.

There are not yet enough detailed reports describing:

• Long-term production use
• Major failures
• Performance bottlenecks
• Difficult integrations
• Support quality
• Migration challenges
• Cost surprises
• Large-enterprise deployments

The absence of complaints should not be interpreted as proof that no problems exist. New products often have limited public criticism simply because the user base is still growing.

Who Should Consider XHawk?

XHawk appears most promising for:

• AI-native software teams using several coding agents
• Startups that want to scale development without increasing headcount proportionally
• Engineering organizations with many repositories and fragmented knowledge
• Teams that repeatedly re-explain architecture to AI assistants
• Organizations experimenting with MCP-based workflows
• Companies interested in persistent agent memory
• Teams that want automated planning, testing, reviews, documentation, and maintenance

It may be less compelling for:

• Individual developers who only need code completion
• Very small projects with limited historical context
• Teams that prefer simple, local-first tooling
• Organizations that are not ready to govern autonomous agents
• Companies requiring extensive third-party validation before adopting new platforms

Final Verdict

XHawk is attempting something more ambitious than building another AI chatbot.

Its central idea—that organizational context should become a persistent, searchable, shared asset for both humans and AI agents—is compelling. The platform combines that idea with multi-model support, agent orchestration, background workers, knowledge graphs, code intelligence, project planning, and flexible deployment.

Its greatest potential advantage is that it could make AI agents progressively more useful over time. Instead of every session beginning with a partial understanding of the project, each interaction could contribute to a growing organizational memory.

That is a powerful vision.

Its greatest weakness is not necessarily a technical flaw. It is the lack of mature, independent evidence.

XHawk is still new. Public feedback is positive but limited. There are few verified long-term reviews, little discussion on established developer forums, and no substantial independent rating history. The company’s productivity claims remain to be validated through broader real-world use.

For early adopters, this may be an opportunity. XHawk could provide a meaningful advantage to teams already working heavily with AI agents and struggling with context loss.

For cautious enterprises, the platform should probably begin as a controlled pilot. Test it on a non-critical repository. Measure context retrieval quality. Review its security controls. Monitor credit consumption. Compare agent output against existing workflows. Most importantly, determine whether the shared context genuinely reduces repeated explanation and improves engineering outcomes.

XHawk may eventually become an important part of the AI-native software stack. But at this stage, it is best viewed as a high-potential platform with a compelling architectural direction—not yet a fully proven industry standard.

...Anil

Why Everything Looks the Same Now—And Why It's Not Just About Logos

Have you ever scrolled through your phone and felt like every brand is starting to look...the same?

I have been noticing this trend since 2007. Those were the days of 2g and 3g. Those were the days of feature phones with very few PDAs(Personal Digital Assistants). The devices looked unique. The features were different and some of them were excellent at photography while others had bold personalities.  

Maybe you don't notice it right away. But after a while, it becomes hard to ignore. A new tech startup launches with a minimalist wordmark. A luxury fashion label quietly drops its iconic serif logo for a plain sans-serif font. A coffee chain opens around the corner, and somehow it looks uncannily similar to three others you've already seen.

Different industries. Different audiences. Yet they all seem to speak the same visual language.

It's a little strange when you think about it now. I had a sense of this when it all while it happened.

Not too long ago, companies fought to stand out. Today, many of them seem to be competing to blend in.

This isn't just a random observation, either. Designers have been talking about it for years. The growing trend toward simplified, minimalist branding has become so widespread that it's almost impossible not to notice once someone points it out. Digital Synopsis explored this phenomenon in a fascinating article that asked a simple question: why do so many modern logos look alike?

The answer, as it turns out, has very little to do with creativity disappearing. Instead, it's the result of technology, changing consumer habits, digital platforms, accessibility requirements, and businesses trying to solve the same problems in the most efficient way possible.

The funny thing is that when everyone follows the same best practices, the results often stop feeling unique.

---

From Bold Personalities to Safe Choices

Think back to some of the world's most recognizable brands.

You probably don't even need to see Coca-Cola's logo to picture it in your mind. The same goes for Disney's handwritten signature or Harley-Davidson's unmistakable shield. Those logos had personality. They weren't trying to look modern for the sake of it—they simply became timeless because they were memorable.

Now compare that with many brands launched over the past decade.

It's not that they're poorly designed. In fact, most are exceptionally well designed. They're clean, balanced, readable, and incredibly versatile. But if you line up twenty of them side by side, something interesting happens.

The differences start shrinking.

Simple geometric fonts. Flat colors. Rounded shapes. Lots of white space.

Individually, each logo works.

Collectively? They begin to blur together.

That's not necessarily because designers ran out of ideas. More often, they're responding to the realities of today's digital world.

A logo now has to work everywhere—from a smartwatch notification and a mobile app icon to a website favicon, a social media profile picture, and a billboard viewed from across the highway. Intricate details that looked fantastic on printed packaging twenty years ago simply don't survive at sixteen pixels.

So companies simplify.

Then their competitors simplify.

Eventually, everyone arrives at roughly the same destination.

---

The Internet Made Inspiration Unlimited—and That's Part of the Problem

Here's something we don't talk about enough.

The internet didn't just make it easier to share ideas.

It also made it easier for those ideas to spread incredibly fast.

Years ago, a graphic designer in Milan might have drawn inspiration from local architecture, magazines, or nearby artists. Someone in Tokyo would have grown up with an entirely different set of influences. Even if they were solving similar design problems, their solutions often reflected their own cultures and experiences.

Today, it's a different story.

Whether you're in London, Mumbai, São Paulo, or Sydney, you're probably browsing the same Pinterest boards, saving the same Behance projects, following the same design influencers, and reading the same newsletters.

That's wonderful for learning.

It's not always wonderful for originality.

When millions of creative people are drinking from the same well of inspiration, it's hardly surprising that their work starts sharing the same visual DNA.

Nobody's copying.

They're simply influenced by the same trends at the same time.

And honestly, that's a very human thing to do.

---

Design Software Has Quietly Changed the Way We Think

There's another factor that's easy to overlook.

The tools we use shape the way we create.

Modern design software encourages consistency. Grid systems. Auto-layouts. Reusable components. Design systems. Responsive interfaces.

These are incredible innovations. They've made collaboration easier and products more accessible than ever before.

But every tool comes with its own way of thinking.

When millions of designers are using similar software, working inside similar frameworks, and building products with similar constraints, it's only natural that their work begins to converge.

The software isn't telling anyone what to create.

It's simply nudging everyone in a similar direction.

Those tiny nudges add up over time.

And after enough years, they become an industry-wide aesthetic.

That's where we find ourselves today.

With love.. Anil

I re-discovered Nolan today with epic called The Odyssey

I didn't like Nolan's movies. Never in first viewing. Either they were too convoluted or against my taste of commercial cinema. Many times, they felt like high budget documentaries. I like documentaries too, but promoting them as commercial cinema didn't make me want to watch his movies. There was something distinct in Nolan that I didnt like in all his movies the first time I watched them either in theater(only one) or OTT.

So here I am hours after the experience of "The Odyssey":

I didn't go for an IMAX experience. I already had the digital IMAX experiences with other biggies, so thought instead of wasting money on IMAX that isn't really that authentic, went for a 4DX version. I intentionally kept my expectations low. Not just because I didn't like Nolan's style, but also because I wasn't confident about Nolan's skill in adapting a story/poem with lots of mystical/magical elements.

Where did it start and where did it end?

The movie builds up slowly but beautifully to the concluding moments of the climax.

A wife waiting stubbornly for 20+ years for her husband’s return: Anne Hathaway was brilliant, especially during those peak climax scenes which reminded me of many black and white movies having duels between NTR and savitri. I dont recollect the movie’s name but this “a wife asking a stranger about her long lost husband, son identifying his father, swayamvar-like bow-string competition, etc” theme feels so relatable to me. I am trying to avoid any kind of spoiler here for all your benefit.

A son awaiting the arrival of his father and trying to explore his whereabouts: Tom Holland with a balanced performance.

Evil group(suitors) playing their own dirty tricks to take over Ithaca.

Odysseus’s relationship with the army, his pet dog, etc were explored beautifully.

No gimmick, no unnecessary mythic creatures, just pure emotional play immersed in real-world locations that feel mythical. Imagine real-world locations that feel magical and feel like these events really happened. In fact he starts off with a text: “during times of apparent magic..”, which means he doesnt truly believe or depict magic but just suggest it using the environment and the characters dialogues.

The sequence of Polyphemus was so brilliantly planned and executed that can beat any horror movie. I never felt such a tension in any other movie. I know something huge is sitting inside the cave, but we get the surprise at the most unexpected moment: The monster comes from the outside, locking them up in the dark cave. I felt like I was locked with them too!

Even the goddess athena is actually a mind-play of Odysseus than a divine form and a representation of his past violent acts.

There were some monsters, huge warriors, dead waking up(hell) and just a passing glimpse of the sirens.

They are not clearly shown, but whatever I saw of them, I felt them more like mermaids than human-bird hybrids.

Calypso is also depicted as normal human rather than a goddess. The beaches look out of the world because of the screenplay and. not because they were not seen anywhere before. Of course some of those locations were very fresh, but what keeps you going is the screenplay and the constant focus on the characters.

There were stunning and immersive sequences, even on a normal screen. Maybe the 4DX experience made it more in-the-movie with the smoke effects, seat-shaking, real thunder-like flashes during the storm, etc.

But even without those physical effects, the movie will capture all your senses because it all feels so real and always goes along the main plot of how Odysseus makes his journey from Troy to his Ithaca kingdom.

Of course the magic is shown in a very different way here. There are some horror-like scenes which keep you guessing where the monster

We can nitpick abut casting, but for me it is a minor thing and that is also the reason I don't call this the best movie for me, but this is more like a classic old time film making, where there were few retakes, lots of rehearsals made for each scene, perfect staging, natural lighting, minimum vfx, etc.

The soundtrack also perfectly gels with the theme of the movie. It is in sync with the happenings on the screen.

The movie stays with you long after it ends.

Mark my words: Even the biggest haters of Nolan will like this movie and discover the secret recipe of Nolan when they just go and watch the movie without comparing it to earlier adaptations. One example is me myself. I hated the imax experience the first time I saw "The Dark Knight". Even though it grew on me later, I was still skeptical of his style of making.

Before watching this, I said this seems like “Baahubali of Hollywood”. It might turn out to be more than that if my predictions are not wrong.

Nolan has raised the standard of epic storytelling to a completely new level. I have only admired SS Rajamouli in imagining and bringing large scale epic stories with emotional connect, but Nolan joins that category with this movie. I dont compare them. Never. But Nolan feels much more refined this time. That is not to say this movie has no faults.

Some casting choices could have been better like Robert Pattinson and some others felt little odd.

For the first time, I tried visualizing this whole movie in terms of how the plot flows and the emotional intensity of the protagonist(without spoilers). As you can see, the movie keeps shifting from present to the past, almost like a sine wave and the emotional line(of the main protagonist) works like an anti-sine wave, with its peak happening almost after its half way while odysseus keeps losing his army. This induces a sense of guilt in him. Sadness+ struggle+guilt is a deadly combination of emotion that can break any human!


Conclusion:

Go for it. If you don't have the best IMAX screen in your city, still go to the nearest theatre. The experience is much larger than any "IMAX" branding. IMAX is like a topping. The main course is Nolan's handling of the story and how he mixes Greek mythology with realistic characters.

Listen to this to get the feel of the movie:

A music compilation(not based on Odyssey) YouTube which is also enjoyable and has a massive mythic feel to it:

With love.. Anil

Beyond Baahubali... There Was Her Story: Avanthika

⚔️ Beyond Baahubali... There Was Her Story

Discover the Untold Journey of Avanthika – The Warrior Who Changed a Kingdom

What if one of the most compelling characters in the Baahubali universe had a story far greater than what was shown on screen?

What if the fearless warrior who captured hearts with her courage, agility, and unwavering determination held secrets capable of reshaping the destiny of kingdoms?

Now, readers have the opportunity to dive into a breathtaking new adventure that explores the untold life of Avanthika in a way never seen before with enhanced descriptions, plot lines and a better presentation:

📖 Get your copy now:

https://amzn.to/4eqh4dM

---

The Story Behind the Warrior

Fast like a cheetah.

Agile like a cat.

Fearless in battle.

Yet vulnerable to love.

Avanthika is one of the most intriguing characters from the legendary Baahubali universe. While millions of fans remember her as the fierce warrior who fought for freedom and justice, very little is known about her life beyond what was shown in the films.

This fan-fiction novel takes readers on an epic journey into the unexplored chapters of her life.

Journey into the hidden corners of Kunthala.

Witness political conspiracies.

Experience heartbreaking sacrifices.

Uncover ancient mysteries.

And discover how one extraordinary woman became instrumental in shaping the future of a kingdom.

---

A Tale of Courage, Destiny, and Secrets

This is not merely another fantasy story.

It is a deep exploration of a beloved character who stands at the crossroads of destiny.

As kingdoms rise and fall around her, Avanthika finds herself facing challenges far greater than any battlefield.

The fate of nations.

The burden of hidden truths.

The complexities of loyalty.

The power of love.

And a puzzle so intricate that solving it may determine the future of an entire civilization.

Every choice she makes carries consequences.

Every alliance hides uncertainty.

Every secret threatens to change everything.

---

For Every Baahubali Fan Who Wanted More

If you've ever watched Baahubali and wondered:

⚔️ What happened before the events of the films?

⚔️ What shaped Avanthika into the warrior she became?

⚔️ What hidden struggles did she endure?

⚔️ What secrets existed within Kunthala?

⚔️ What stories remained untold?

Then this novel was written for you.

This fan-fiction expands the universe while honoring the spirit of the character that audiences around the world came to admire.

---

Why Readers Will Love This Book

Rich Character Development

Experience Avanthika as you've never seen her before.

Not only as a warrior.

But as a daughter.

A friend.

A strategist.

A protector.

A dreamer.

And a woman navigating the complexities of destiny.

Epic Fantasy World-Building

Step into:

🏰 Ancient kingdoms

⚔️ Deadly battlefields

🌿 Hidden forests

🗡 Secret missions

👑 Royal conspiracies

🔮 Ancient mysteries

Every location comes alive with cinematic detail and immersive storytelling.

Emotional Storytelling

Beyond the action lies a deeply human story about:

❤️ Love

💔 Loss

🛡 Sacrifice

🌅 Hope

🔥 Redemption

The emotional journey is just as compelling as the adventure itself.

Mystery and Intrigue

At the heart of the story lies a complicated puzzle that challenges everything Avanthika believes she knows.

As clues emerge and secrets unfold, readers are taken on a suspense-filled journey where nothing is quite what it seems.

---

An Epic Fan-Fiction Adventure

Fan-fiction allows us to revisit beloved worlds through fresh perspectives.

This novel embraces that opportunity by shining a spotlight on one of Baahubali's most fascinating yet underexplored characters.

It imagines:

✨ New adventures

✨ Untold histories

✨ Hidden relationships

✨ Political intrigue

✨ Heroic struggles

✨ Kingdom-shaping decisions

All woven together into a gripping narrative that expands the possibilities of Avanthika's world.

---

Why This Story Matters

Great heroes are remembered.

But great stories reveal what made them heroes in the first place.

Avanthika's journey is one of resilience.

She is a warrior forged by hardship.

A woman tested by impossible choices.

A protector willing to sacrifice everything.

And a leader whose actions echo across generations.

This book explores those dimensions and gives readers a chance to experience the legend from an entirely new perspective.

---

Perfect For Readers Who Enjoy

✔ Baahubali-inspired stories

✔ Epic fantasy adventures

✔ Strong female protagonists

✔ Historical fantasy

✔ Kingdom politics

✔ Warrior heroines

✔ Mystery and intrigue

✔ Action-packed storytelling

✔ Character-driven narratives

✔ Fan-fiction expansions of beloved worlds

---

Start the Adventure Today

The kingdoms await.

The mysteries remain unsolved.

The battle for destiny has only begun.

Join Avanthika on an unforgettable journey through courage, sacrifice, love, and destiny.

⚔️ Discover the untold story.

📖 Start reading now:

https://amzn.to/4eqh4dM

Because beyond Baahubali...

There was her story.

Special countdown offer is running between 18july and 26july 2026!

With love.. Anil

Baahubali The Epic.. A possible script..

Merging, remastering and compressing a 2hr 38mins of Baahubali: The Beginning and 2hr 47mins of Baahubali: The Conclusion is no mean achievement and this is just my crazy idea to imagine what and how the movie could be cut to compress all that emotion, story and action into a 3 hr 44 movie:

(Fan) Screenplay by: [Anilmation] Duration: 3 Hours 44 Minutes

Genre: Mythic Historical Epic / Action-DramaPROLOGUE (8 mins)

Storm rages. Sivagami, wounded and bleeding, emerges from a cave clutching an infant. Soldiers chase her through the river.Sivagami (to the skies):

“Lord Shiva, save this child. Mahendra Baahubali must live for Mahishmati!”She lifts the baby above the river, drowns, and the child flows downriver—found by villagers. The woman Sanga raises him as Sivudu.

ACT I: THE RISE OF SIVUDU (35 mins):

Sequence of Sivudu’s youth under the waterfall. He dreams of the mountain above—his destiny beyond sight. After countless failures, he climbs the cliff.Add deleted visual montage of his struggles with storms, rockfalls (from alternate Japanese cut).Reaching the summit, he meets Avantika, a warrior of Kuntala. He learns of her mission—to free Devasena, queen imprisoned by Mahishmati’s tyrant Bhallaladeva.Romantic tension builds. Avantika’s tears as Sivudu paints her shoulder-tattoo remains intact. When she gives him her mission, he whispers:

“The woman you love should never go to war alone.”

ACT II: THE RESCUE OF DEVASENA (25 mins):

Sivudu infiltrates Mahishmati. The iconic statue sequence is retained: he saves the falling structure by sheer strength.Amid celebrations, he storms the prison fort and rescues Devasena, battling Bhallaladeva’s son Bhadra. Sivudu kills him swiftly.Kattappa, the slave-warrior, pursues—but seeing Sivudu’s face, drops his sword.

Kattappa (overwhelmed): “Baahubali!”Cut to a wide reveal of Sivudu’s stunned face.

INTERMISSION FLASHBACK: THE LEGEND OF AMARENDRA (1 hr 15 mins):

A beautiful dissolve leads into Kattappa’s narration, spanning Amarendra’s youth:Queen Sivagami raising both princes, Amarendra and Bhallaladeva.The Kalakeya War in full glory—kept intact with enhanced deleted footage of Baahubali’s strategic counterstorm tactics.Baahubali’s mercy on civilians contrasts Bhallaladeva’s cruelty.Despite Amarendra's heroism, political deceit makes Bhallaladeva king, sowing seeds of future tragedy.Amarendra and Devasena (Love & Politics)Add deleted Kuntala kingdom scenes:

The joyous market, the archery practice, the humorous spar between Amarendra and Devasena where they ambush bandits.Their romance evolves naturally—ending in a rebellious marriage against Sivagami’s arranged plans.Bijjaladeva manipulates events, accusing Amarendra of treason. He is banished yet revered by the people.

ACT III: THE ASSASSINATION AND THE FALL (35 mins)

Devasena, pregnant, faces growing tension as Amarendra continues serving the people outside the palace.

A night sequence—deleted from the theatrical version—shows Amarendra fighting off a surprise Kalakeya ambush to protect Kattappa (from Japanese alternate cut).​

Moments later, Kattappa lures him into isolation.

Amarendra (smiling): “My sword for you always.”

Kattappa (trembling): “My loyalty... even when it breaks my soul.”

He stabs Amarendra.

The heart-wrenching “Why, Kattappa?” echoes before Amarendra dies under a monsoon sky.

Soon, the kingdom drowns in chaos—Devasena escapes with her infant, Sivagami sacrifices her life saving the baby (linking back to the prologue).

ACT IV: MAHENDRA’S RETURN (45 mins):

The revelation devastates Sivudu—now Mahendra Baahubali. With renewed rage, he rallies Avantika, Kattappa, and the rebel armies of Kuntala.

Massive battle preparation montage—blacksmiths forging weapons, rebels painting banners, and Kattappa standing before Baahubali’s statue.

The final siege of Mahishmati:

Elephants charge, flaming boulders crash, water siege machines erupt.

Bhallaladeva fights with monstrous ferocity, wielding spiked chariots.

Mahendra and Bhalla duel atop the burning palace.

Bhallaladeva (mocking): “Even your father kneeled before me!”

Mahendra: “He kneeled before loyalty. I kneel before justice.”

After a brutal sword exchange, Mahendra impales Bhallaladeva on Devasena’s burning pyre.

EPILOGUE (8 mins)

Coronation sequence mirrors Amarendra’s victory long ago. Avantika crowns Mahendra. Devasena blesses her son, as Kattappa bows in peace.

The camera cranes up to the palace spire.

Child’s voice (off): “Will Baahubali’s son rule one day?”

Elder’s voice: “Only Lord Shiva knows.”

Fade out on the Mahishmati insignia—restored glory, perpetual legend.

NOTES ON COMPRESSION AND FLOW

Songs retained only as instrumental montages.

Dialogue density cut by 30% for fluid transitions.

Flashback transitions designed with visual rhyme (e.g., Shivudu lifting Lingam → Amarendra lifting War Elephant).

Final runtime balanced:

Act I: 35 mins

Act II: 25 mins

Flashback: 75 mins

Act III: 35 mins

Act IV + Epilogue: 50 mins

Credit Scroll: 4 mins

This unified script balances spectacle, emotion, and mythic scale—interweaving the emotional arcs of mother, son, and duty while maintaining momentum for a single, seamless epic experience

With love.. Anil

"Tum Paas Aa Rahe Ho"(Veer Zaara, 2004): Its lyrics keep haunting

Just stumbled across a song that I keep singing in my mind occassionally during travel or during relaxing times, among other things:

I know word by word translation might not do complete justice without the context in which this song gives out the beauty in its full glory:

Occassionally, I can explain it in the context of the movie, as below:

Dheere, dheere Slowly, slowly

Dheere, dheere Slowly, slowly

Aankhon mein chha rahe ho You're spreading in my eyes

Tum paas aa rahe ho You're coming closer to me

The protagonist is feeling the closeness of his lover while is is missing her during his days in a foreign (Pakistani prison in this case) prison. He is wrongly arrested for being a spy while on his way back to India. This song is not present in the movie, but the lyrics sync beautifully with the emotions that he might be going through in the prison, longing for her. Remember, he sacrificed his original plan of taking away zaara by understanding the pain of her mother in a beautiful dialogue, which I am translating here for context: 
Zaara's mother: "Is every boy of your nation like you?"(after witnessing his sacrifice)
Veer: "I am not sure if about that, but every Indian mother is definitely like you!"

Just giving a link to this particular scene below for your reference:

Chupke, chupke Silently, silently

Chupke, chupke Silently, silently

Dil mein samaa rahe ho You're settling in my heart

Tum paas aa rahe ho You're coming closer to me

Dheere, dheere Slowly, slowly

Chupke, chupke Silently, silently

If you observe closely, the words "dheere" and "chupke" get repeated multiple times, but it doesnt feel repetitive because it shows the mood of Veer and the setting he is locked in: time running very slowly, and silence of his prison.

Jhukti hui yeh palkein Your eyes that look down

Khulte hue yeh gesu Your hair that is flowing

Jhukti hui yeh palkein Your eyes that look down

Khulte hue yeh gesu Your hair that is flowing

Yeh sharm ki adayein Your style full of shyness

Woh shokhiyon ka jaadu The magic of your pranks

Kaise, kaise Of what kind, of what kind

Kaise, kaise Of what kind, of what kind

Sapne dikha rahe ho You're showing me dreams

Tum paas aa rahe ho You're coming closer to me

Dheere, dheere Slowly, slowly

Chupke, chupke Silently, silently

Veer remembers all those moments that happened with Zaara: 

Her eyes looked down while crossing a rope bridge.

Her hair is flowing with the wind, covering her beautiful face, and as he pushes the strands away while rescuing her, he sees her face for the first time! She was terrified with the height and he even mentions that during the moment.

He remembers all of these and feels her coming closer in his dreams.

Phoolon bhare nazaare These flower filled sceneries

Yeh khushboon ke dere These fragrance filled places

Phoolon bhare nazaare These flower filled sceneries

Yeh khushboon ke dere These fragrance filled places

Lagte hai khwaab jaise It seems like a dream

Yeh shaam yeh savere These evenings and mornings

Haule, haule Softly, softly

Haule, haule Softly, softly

Armaan jaga rahe ho You're awakening my desires

Tum paas aa rahe ho You're coming closer to me

Veer remembers and feels all those flower filled fields(specifically the mustard fields in Punjab/Haryana) across which he roamed with Zaara. He even feels the aroma across them and the scenic moments during evenings and mornings when the sun rise starts to reawaken his desires!

Chupke, chupke Silently, silently

Dheere, dheere Slowly, slowly

Aankhon mein chha rahe ho You're spreading in my eyes

Tum paas aa rahe ho You're coming closer to me

Aa ha ha ... ha ... ho ho ho  Hmmm ... la la la Hmmm ... la la la

Credits: 

Music: Madan Mohan

Lyrics: Javed Akhtar

All the above scenes might not be possible to fit in the movie due to length issues or breaking the narrative flow. Imagine this song coming out when we see an old Veer in the dark prison. It might not fit at that moment, but when we imagine it after the movie ends, we will realize how beautiful these lyrics are in the context of the movie. 

I do realize the political conflicts between India and Pakistan, but this is just a movie and movies are for entertainment and experience and not for judgements or hatred. I am not sure if Veer-Zaara was accepted with the same enthusiasm during its re-release in November 2024, that it received when it was released long back in November 2004. During its initial release and my first viewing, the movie didnt make that big an impact, but as I understood its soul and the lyrics clearly, I keep revelling in all those symbolic moments that were part of this movie!

With love.. Anil

The story behind my music jam: "Inevitable Revenge" under Anilmation Tunes.

Inevitable Revenge by anilreddy12001.

This has been the track that I mixed and enjoyed the process the most in the past 3-4 years. 

Music Maker Jam is the app that I used to create this and it has a theme of revenge but with a focus on the pain and the way he feels after losing his girl and finally getting the revenge by killing the convict gang. It has a feel of the movie "Ghajini".

If I were to shoot a small video for this track, it would focus more on the guy's facial expressions and body language more than the violence that he is creating around him, with occasional blurred, close-up visuals of his girl enjoying a stroll along a beach.

Basically it should feel like he is getting released from prison with lots of psychological energy rather than physical masculinity.

He would look rather simple in a dirty, casual t-shirt and a cargo pant, with a machette in his hand instead of armed with a firearm. I somehow don't enjoy someone using advanced machinery in an action scene, and would rather like something more simple as a tool to inflict the damage. Basically the weapon shouldn't dominate the shot. He should dominate the act. The audience should see his intent to kill and feel for him rather than whistle for those weapons.

And if I were to add lyrics to this song, it should be worth adding or else completely avoid any vocals. If we can convey the same message with a BGM that depicts the situation perfectly, we don't need lyrics. Yes, in some cases we do need lyrics to understand certain situations, but they should be clear instead of being dominated by the background music or heavy instrumentation.

Below is the link for anyone to listen:

https://api.jam-community.com/song/detail/5b7a3a6c-42a1-11f0-a9e4-06b28167ed55

With love.. Anil

Thunderbolts: A Return to the golden "Marvel"?

Okay, it has been a long time since I actually wrote an article. There are many reasons for that:

The busy life being one of those, but the primary reason remains getting caught in an unending loop of weekdays-weekends-weekdays-weekends.

Yes, I do have many thoughts in my mind but there was no way to express it on a platform due to lack of time or the enthusiasm. It got lost somewhere off late, but definitely still alive inside.

So today let me describe my experience of watching a marvel movie called "Thunderbolts".

It has been a long time since I watched an MCU movie with so much interest, and the recent "Captain America: Brave new World" comes close to this.

Credit: Marvel studios

First off, the cast: We know most of them through previous movies like "Black Widow" and "Antman and the Wasp", but none of those really worked wonders at the box office. "Falcon and the Winter Soldier" was a nice Disney+ series but didnt make much of an impact.

But this movie is well made. The action felt real, the performances natural, the threat stunning and overall plot leaves you guessing and asking for more.

Plot line:

Without putting out any spoilers(it has been more than a month since its release, but I would still keep it spoiler-free), Valentina's plans to eliminate the thunderbolts fails, but not before a new character enters in a very innocent way. This new character is Sentry: A new threat for the world. After the thunderbolts escape from her, Valentina captures and controls Sentry and the mismatches try to join hands to stop Sentry. Sounds simple is it not? No. The way they finally come together and form the "new avengers" at the end is what make it truly special.

What works:

The chemistry between Yelena Belova, US Agent, Red Guardian and Winter Soldier. They all feel like the perfect misfit needed in this movie.

What could have improved:

There could have been some breathing space amid all the action and solo villain's pursuit.

What doesnt work:

Departure from the thunderbolts expected by the audience and turning them into "New Avengers" is something most cannot digest. For those not much concerned about comic book events, it might not matter much, but it does leave some kind of "void". I expected a little bit more depth for Taskmaster and Sentry's chilhood trauma. It felt superficial. 

My verdict: Definitely a must watch for Marvel fans. But did it reach Marvel's previous glory? Just missed by a whisker.

With love.. Anil

"Avanthika: The Maahishmathi Saga" now live on Amazon Kindle platform.

For those who watched or followed the Baahubali series either in movies or series or animated versions, Avanthika has been a less-explored character. She was hardly explored. What her likes are, where is she from, how she grew up, what made her do what she did, and the overall character arc.

It is with this curiosity that I wrote a book from her perspective.

I just named it "Avanthika: The Maahishmathi Saga", because it involves many characters that we might have seen already. Below is the link to the book:

It has been a long time since I wrote a story and here it is. It is available in both printed format(hard copy) as well as the Kindle format that you could read on your device.

It is part of the Maahishmathi Saga, which are fan-fictions based on the hugely popular Baahubali Universe.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BGY88HZK

Do check it out and let me know how it is!

With love.. Anil

Looking beyond the "k" files..

The public's thought process is strange: 

They say they will never forget, but never will they sincerely work towards that.

That brings us to this: a movie that deals with the events of 1990, reportedly with a very raw style: No drama, no exaggerations, no half measures, no censored content, no pixelated images, no colour-negative images, no syrupy dialogues.

truth. just pure truth, as the makers themselves, say, with a little dramatization of real events.

Even though it turns out it does have its own cinematic liberties, the audience tends to believe that all of this is true. And they are not wrong in their reaction. Emotions do run high, especially when fiction is added to recorded history.

So, the problem here is not that the public is loving this movie and running high on emotions, the problem is that nothing was done to heal the wounds and in the meantime, the same wounds are being tinkered with by dissecting them with sharp knives of the director and scissors of the editor.

No, there is nothing wrong with either the director or the producers or anyone who visualized this movie in their minds or hearts. The problem is the way the public is responding to it. They might justifiably promote this movie themselves without any of the huge promotional tours with the star cast from the producers. But the way the audience is reacting is in the extremes: They either loved it or hated it. This is when these polarized reactions start to create an image of our society.

Society thinks that showing off their love or hatred for a movie is enough to make a point or lead to a feeling of justice. This is NOT the justice that the victims deserved. The justice that they deserve is this: Punish those responsible for this shameless event that was one of the many blots on the image of India, our India.

The victims will never get complete justice, simply because many of them lost their lives during these 30+ years of living as refugees.

Some of the questions that the audience really needs to ask are these:

1. Why did the Kashmiri Pandits not go back despite the change in governments?

The problem is not financial issues or security. It has to do with the sense of belonging. They need to feel that Kashmir is their home and no one can take that away from them. And who needs to work on this? Not just the local state government, not just the central government, it is Everyone.

2. What is the status of those who are responsible for this huge mess? Living a VIP life?

3. Are Kashmiri Pandits living like citizens of India? Do they have a life that they could call theirs? Can they sleep a night without nightmares of those events of 1990?

These are the questions that the whole nation needs to think about and fight to get answers.

In the meantime, the movie crosses one milestone from another and crosses box office records set by previous hits.

Regards, 

Anil

Spiderman NoWayHome: Beyond expectations!

Now that the biggest and latest spiderman movie is out and the response of the public growing with each passing day despite all the spoilers from day one itself, we can safely say that spoilers wont matter in this mini review of the movie. Yes, it is a mini review because there is so much to be written about this magical movie which deserves multiple viewings.

Before are the highlights of this movie and how it delivered with respect to the expectations that we had from its trailers(spoiler warning):

1. Aunt May's Death

Keep all the multiversal characters aside, Tom Holland showed what he is capable of as an actor in an intense role. He brought all the complex emotions to screen with ease. This is evident in many scenes, including aunt May's death. The whole sequence of her passing away is one of the highlights of this movie and one which came true from the expected plot. Yes, this is a team-up movie, yes, this had all the action and thrills and light hearted moments and funny scenes, but the hero is still Tom Holland and this is his story! 

2. Doctor Strange-Spiderman relationship

The relationship between Doctor Strange and Spiderman was another highlight. It started off with Tom Holland making things complicated during the first magic spell, simply due to his lack of clarity of what he wanted. He kept on adding people who he wants to remember him. The frustration of Doctor Strange is understandable since he doesnt know the complete working of multiverse or the spell.

During the final one to close the multiversal rift, his relationship with him gets even better and he sees the growth of Peter Parker as the one who is capable of making sacrifice to save the world. We can see in his eyes his admiration of the kid from Queens as he waits for him to say final good byes to all his friends(multiversal and schoolmate friends). It is not easy at all for anyone to take such a tough decision after what he has gone through.

3. Peter living a life of anonymity

This is another highlight which shows his acting prowess and the way the script was handled. When MJ and Ned forget him at the end, the way he converses with MJ and his reaction to their successfull admission to MIT, is a scene to behold. We can see tears of satisfaction and joy in Tom Holland's eyes as MJ converses with him as a complete stranger. This shows that his decision to make the whole world forget him was clear and without any confusion. He wanted his near and dear to be safe and he finally achieves it.

4: Bringing the foes to his home

Before the death of his aunt, the sequence of events does matter a lot as those moments add that much needed gravity to the tragic result. We were always nervous what the villains would do. Finally, his spidey sense catches the intentions of green goblin(Norman Osborne) by stopping him temporarily before hell lets loose. Many would argue that this is not a good idea to heal them, but the fact is that this is the crux of who spiderman is: He always gives people a second chance and tries to help them during their times of distress. It is also according to aunt may's ideals and what she says in her famous final words: "With great power comes great responsibility".

5: Chemistry between Andrew, Tobey and Tom Holland

Even though all the spidermen were 90% confirmed after the second trailer, audience were still keeping their fingers crossed before they jumped out of their seats when they finally saw their former favorite spidermen on the big screen after such a long gap. Their interaction was one of the film's lighter moments which also shows the contrast between these characters' arc.

Andrew Garfield should definitely get an academy award for denying his involvement all this time!

6: Interaction between the spidermen and their respective foes

After healing each of those foes, the respective spidermen kind of clear their acts and go back to their universes only after having a word with them. Tobey, for instance is the eldest and does look aged and with a back pain. Even in this age, Tobey says to Doc Ock : "Trying to do better", an obvious reference to his dialogue in "Spiderman-2" during a conversation with doc ock before the failed fusion experiment.

Below are the expectations vs actual movie:

1. What we expected: Andrew Garfield saves MJ.

What we saw: 100% of our expectation.

2. What we expected: Tobey saves Ned.

What we saw: Ned is saved by Doctor Strange's cloak of levitation.

3. What we expected: Aunt May gets killed by the pumpkin bomb.

What we saw: 100% of our expectation, but more elaborated and even more deeply involving. It is not an instant death or visible injury(like how Tobey was hurt in the first ever spiderman movie), but a more painful one, involving inability to breathe or internal injuries. This makes a bigger impact.

4. What we expected: 3 Spidermen in the same frame with 3 villains.

What we saw: 100% of our expectation, with the exception that sandman is not really a foe but refuses to go back to his universe. Sony really needs to be more careful in editing out characters from a fight scene as even a small glitch would lead to tons of theories and confirmations! The sudden movement of lizard's head in the trailer was indeed due to "the amazing spiderman"'s kick!

Bottomline: Go watch nowayhome on the biggest screen that you might find, with all that you might have expected, but there are small important things that will surprise you even beyond your expectations! This has more than the cameos. This is a kind of Spiderman's own Endgame!

With love.. Anil